They all averaged less disposals per game than Paul Hasleby in 2007.
Does the editor of the West Australian Sports department hang around pubs looking for Eagle scarf wearing drunks and ask them to write articles for his paper?
Does the editor of the West Australian Sports department hang around pubs looking for Eagle scarf wearing drunks and ask them to write articles for his paper?
Seriously, why would the Dockers want to trade their leading player in the clearances, getting the hard ball out, going forward and kicking needed goals? There was a number of games that Paul dominated, including one in which he had 37 disposals, most of them quality.
He does, however, need to stay clear of the Seaview mid-week.
Umm… they’re playing the final series?…
๐
only for two games ๐
And Embley may not play any of them..
Paul Haselby was up and down, his back is stuffed and if he reckons he’s worth $450 thousand a year for three years he’s dreaming! Yes, he’s a good player and worth keeping, but if he plays hard ball he just might find himself in for a bit of a shock.
I agree with your basic sentiment….he’s worth keeping, but not worth as much as some others.
none are overweight?
^_^
kidding
Possibly still struggling with OP?
But seriosuly; who reads the West in Perth?
Every page has an advert.
Why do you still read the West. It just makes you angry.
They all have a premiership medallion?